Andrew Wiles

mac QUESTION: Does Evernote slow down with more notes?

38 posts in this topic

As the title says: Does Evernote slow, the more notes you add?

I ask this because, surely it can't run as fast with 100 notes, as it does with say 2,000 notes?

Or is it magic? All I am going from is, normal experience, on a computer. When you open a large file, or intensive computer programe, that is data heavy, things seem to take a while.

So I am curious if Evernote's efficiency, ever slows (not referring to syncing).

Share this post


Link to post

I haven't noticed a significant difference and I have many thousands of notes. Of course, the spec of the machine you are using is also going to have an impact.

Share this post


Link to post

search is slow.

it is maddening, because it does an instant search that starts somewhere around the third letter. with 5000+ notes getting searched for any word with the three-letter combination in them, there is an awful lag. i am hoping that evernote will reconsider the instant search in the future, because if you copy and paste a search in from another program, the search is very fast.

Share this post


Link to post

The "3rd character lag" should be trademarked. It has been around for many upgrades of Evernote and can be quite frustrating.

To avoid the affect, I avert my eyes from the search screen monitor and consciously stare at the keyboard as I power my way through the remainder of the search criteria. Eventually Evernote catches up with my keystrokes and then I take a look at the screen.

.

Share this post


Link to post

The "3rd character lag" should be trademarked. It has been around for many upgrades of Evernote and can be quite frustrating.

I just don't understand the benefit. Why would anyone want this?

Share this post


Link to post

Recently, I've seen so may high-tech companies duking it out over frivolous patents - "the patent wars" - I thought I'd throw in a possibility for Evernote.

I agree - my attempt at sarcasm failed in this case.

But the impact of the "3rd character lag" is still frustrating.

Share this post


Link to post

The "3rd character lag" should be trademarked. It has been around for many upgrades of Evernote and can be quite frustrating.

To avoid the affect, I avert my eyes from the search screen monitor and consciously stare at the keyboard as I power my way through the remainder of the search criteria. Eventually Evernote catches up with my keystrokes and then I take a look at the screen.

.

lol. me too! i close my eyes and keep typing to the end, but the lag is so bad i sometimes take a sip of tea as well. that cracks me up. i knew i wasn't the only one.

as for why anyone would want instant search, you'd have to ask toyota (the maker's of the worst navigation system i have ever used), google (the one's who ruin your searches, unless you login to take advantage of your preferences that allow you to turn off instant search), and any number of misguided tech people who think this is more user-friendly.

Share this post


Link to post
, google (the one's who ruin your searches, unless you login to take advantage of your preferences that allow you to turn off instant search) . . .

Well, that is the key: The OPTION to turn it OFF.

If Evernote wants to pattern their search after Google, then they should make it optional (yet another long debate :) )

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

Weird, I don't see this when I am searching - maybe I type slower than you chaps?

Share this post


Link to post

I think the theory behind it is to help (theoretically) speed up the process of searching for something.

I.e. if you are one who doesn't type very fast, or have a long search term it could produce a result without having to complete the search etc...then it could help...

You can see this in the way google describes the search:

http://www.google.com/insidesearch/instant-about.html

But for the rest of you who are faster than the instant search, it is definitely annoying...very.

Share this post


Link to post

From the Google Help on Instant Search:

Using Google Instant can save 2-5 seconds per search.

But this does not account for how long the user must look at each of the links found to find the ONE link they need.

So I save 5 sec on the search, but spend an extra 30 sec clicking several links --- that is NO help.

Also, the other BIG advantage of Google is the auto-complete, so that as I type Google is suggesting completion of what I will type.

I find this very useful.

The other problem is that with Evernote I will likely have several Search terms that change the Search dramatically.

I may have several "tag:" terms, an "intitile:" term, and several free text words.

Until I get to my last Search term there may be hundreds, even thousands, of Notes which match -- that is NO help.

Now, I read earlier that Evernote attracts "non-technical" people more so that most other apps.

I suspect with these people that most of their searches are just free text (like Google).

So, maybe the Instant Search is of help to them.

So, make Evernote Instant Search an option, and set the default to "ON".

Those of us who use more complex searches to turn it "OFF".

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

It seems pretty clear that options are not seen as desirable at Evernote - for whatever reason, I'm not interested in an argument about whether they are right or wrong.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

you'll get no argument from me. i've already made my case for options. evernote is snappy, but the search is slow, though, so i wouldn't mind them getting rid of instant searches :)

Share this post


Link to post

I also had terrible search lags and freezes that were upgraded to merely bad search lags and freezes with 3.0.6. This is very frustrating, because I can't finish a search without a freeze. (This is one reason I've had a hard time getting on the search-is-your-best-friend train.) Jbenson and GrumpyMonkey, not until you said that you two look away while searching did I realize I've started to do this too. Haha! But also, ugh.

I emailed support about this a week ago and got this response:

Ticket # 16051-64787

Dear Peter,

We apologize for the inconvenience, however it appears there is currently a bug causing this.

We appreciate you taking the time to send us this error. We have filed an internal bug report with the QA team lead. She will classify and fix the bugs in the order determined by the project Lead.

Unfortunately this is not something I can fix for you at this time.

Once again, we apologize for the inconvenience.

Thanks for making Evernote a better product,

Given that Dlu has told us both that Evernote will not consider adding any more options that don't currently exist be adding new options anytime soon and that Evernote will not be giving up instant search, I really, really hope this bug gets fixed in future versions. Given that some Mac users don't experience it, though (lucky guy, that Metrodon), I'm afraid those of us currently stuck with search lag/freeze are probably going to have to live with it for a long time. Oy.

EDIT: Struckthrough wording above rephrased.

Share this post


Link to post

@peter

thanks for posting this. it's good to see i'm not the only one frustrated by this. in the larger scheme of things, i guess it's not such a big deal. but, because i depend so much on the search capabilities of evernote, it is an annoyance i cannot easily escape.

to be fair to dlu, i think what he said was that they were reluctant to add any options, because they wanted to avoid feature bloat. i suspect a search option is unlikely by this criteria :)

Share this post


Link to post

Well, Evernote may not ever change their position on providing Options, but you never know.

I have seen them reverse their decisions/positions before.

Perhaps if we continue point out how an options would be of great help to resolving conflicting requirements Evernote will see the light.

Share this post


Link to post

Well, Evernote may not ever change their position on providing Options, but you never know.

I have seen them reverse their decisions/positions before.

Perhaps if we continue point out how an options would be of great help to resolving conflicting requirements Evernote will see the light.

You're quite free to do that. I will say that I don't find sheer repetition persuasive. So go for broke on originality :P

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post

Well, Evernote may not ever change their position on providing Options, but you never know.

I have seen them reverse their decisions/positions before.

Perhaps if we continue point out how an options would be of great help to resolving conflicting requirements Evernote will see the light.

You're quite free to do that. I will say that I don't find sheer repetition persuasive. So go for broke on originality :)

Once upon time when programmers added an option they thought was good, they had the foresight to include the option to turn it off just in case their customers did not feel quite as ecstatic about the new feature.

It takes little to no effort to write an off switch at the time new features or any features are introduced. Sadly the whole programming world has turned South in this regard in the last few years. Guess this is what they are teaching at programming school these days.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

I'm on Windows/iPhone/iPad/Android/web. IME, the search can slow/bog down with more notes. Windows is the fastest client, that I use. Normally the search is pretty fast, unless it's syncing or I have other high priority CPU stuff going on. Worst case scenario is it takes me 5-7 minutes to find the note(s) I'm looking for if it's hung up b/c of sync'ing & I have a lot of other apps running at the same time.

Mobile apps (iPhone, iPad, Android) take longer but that's probably to be expected.

But...did I mention I have over 46,000 notes? So even with the lag time, IMO, that's pretty darned good. I do know scalability is a prime concern for EN folks. OTOH, I think I'm also in the minority (at this point in time) with the number of notes I have. I know there are several users with many more notes than I have. But I do think I'm on the "other" side of the bell curve. So I'd have to think for most users, there's not a noticable difference between 10-2000 notes. OTOH, as was mentioned earlier & even in this post, the computer/device you're using as well as the connection (wifi, 3g, edge, dial up - yes, there are some poor souls still using dial up) that can contribute to the turnaround time as well.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

"search" is snappy for me (5000+ notes), but the instant search "process" is infuriating at times. I can pretty much always find what i am looking for by the time i am done typing, but the road to get there is a long one. sometimes, i type out the search in another app and paste it into evernote. i imagine this will be my standard operating procedure if i ever get to 45000 notes. i do hope they consider getting rid of instant search, or making it an option. thankfully, there is no instant search on the ipad (yet) as i recall. i just sold mine today, so i cannot test that... please come soon ipad 3 :)

Share this post


Link to post

Yeah, the issue isn't how fast notes appear; it's whether and for how long the search box freezes or lags. For me, on most searches, that's a few seconds.

Share this post


Link to post

I would love to see a configuration check box for turning off search-as-you-type--irritating "feature."

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post

I have not far from 5000 notes. I use on 3 computers. Synchronisation take more and mor times. I bought faster computer for better using evernote (i call everslow)...

I think there are lots of optimizations to do.

Share this post


Link to post

I have 6700 notes. Syncing doesn't take long at all for me. However, I had trouble with a database and had to re-download all of my notes. It took two days (nearly three) for me to download them. I think this could definitely be improved. The same amount of data only takes a few minutes to download from other sites.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

I have 6700 notes. Syncing doesn't take long at all for me. However, I had trouble with a database and had to re-download all of my notes. It took two days (nearly three) for me to download them. I think this could definitely be improved. The same amount of data only takes a few minutes to download from other sites.

Whether or not syncing is a problem, or takes a long time, depends on how many, and what size, notes need to be sync'd.

GM, in your case, syncing of all of your notes (6700) is a problem because of the excessive time it took. Just to be clear, what you described as "downloading" is syncing. :)

I had a case where I needed to sync 300 Notes on my EN Win. This took 15 minutes, way too long. Normally (previously), sync of this number of notes would be done in a few seconds.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now