Jump to content

rezecib

Ex Employees
  • Posts

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

rezecib last won the day on June 19 2018

rezecib had the most liked content!

8 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

2,056 profile views

rezecib's Achievements

98

Reputation

2

Community Answers

  1. @s2sailor Hm, you're right, it's missing there too. You can still do it with ctrl+cmd+k (or via the Format>Styles menu), but it's not in the formatting bar.
  2. I'm guessing it's the non-beta web client (which is using the older editor since the new one broke a while back). Edit: looks like it must be the Mac client, actually @Allison Jaynes You can get those extra formatting options back in the beta either web client, which you can opt into from the settings page. (the beta is missing a few features itself at the moment, but those should get in eventually). You could also try the checkbox lists (and then check completed items instead of doing strikethrough on bulleted/numbered lists).
  3. @Mel Matsuoka I believe this is controlled by the OS, you can disable it in System Preferences > Keyboard > Text > uncheck "Use smart quotes and dashes"
  4. You can get to it by clicking the notebook icon in the sidebar (the one highlighted in DTLow's image).
  5. @ReBo @qofmiwok They rolled back server-side changes, I'm not aware of any clients getting rolled back.
  6. You can opt into the beta for it now from the account page.
  7. @laird I don't think there's another way to nicely access the edit/remove controls for links (although the link button at the top is... okay I guess), but here's a Tampermonkey script to hide them: // ==UserScript== // @name Evernote Link Hover Controls Disabler // @namespace https://www.evernote.com/ // @version 0.1 // @description Disable hover-over link controls // @author rezecib // @match http*://www.evernote.com/* // @grant GM_addStyle // ==/UserScript== (function() { 'use strict'; GM_addStyle(` #gwt-debug-FloatingLinkBar-root { visibility: hidden !important; } `); })();
  8. I feel your pain on this. I don't work on anything client-side, but for what it's worth I gave it an upvote. For now, cmd+A, cmd+shift+K (or corresponding ctrl commands for Windows edit: ctrl+A, ctrl+R) should strip out all links pretty fast. I know it's not the same, though, especially if there are a couple of links you do want. Also looks like on Mac client selecting some text and doing cmd+shift+K actually removes all links from the document rather than just the links touching the selection. Bug report time...
  9. @fornix @cynthiayeung Hmm, I would've expected code blocks to be in the app store version. There's an option in the app's preferences for it-- in the app, Evernote > Preferences... > Software Update > Enable code block (at the bottom). Maybe they're saving config in different places and it happened to be disabled in the app store version's config? Edit: Software Update tab doesn't exist in App Store version, which I guess makes sense. I submitted a bug ticket for this and it seems to have caught some attention, yay. @sgtsunshine I would love to be able to tell you otherwise, but I haven't heard anything since, I think the plan is still to "fix" it by releasing the new web client as soon as it's ready. It's possible that third-party wrappers of the web client like Tusk may still be able to support it (if they are using an older version of a browser embedded), so that's something to look into if you want it back sooner.
  10. @nuke It's not just code blocks that broke, but the whole editor. It's running off of an old version of the editor until the new web client. Apparently fixing the editor without the new web client wasn't easy, but I can only speculate as to why.
  11. @AndyDent Not sure-- my JS experience is at the Greasemonkey script level, I'm not really familiar with frameworks available for it (well, I hear about them sometimes, but...). The Common Editor isn't really responsible for sync, though (it's responsible for UI to manipulate ENML), so that would vary more substantially by client.
  12. The old web editor (which was rolled back to for Chrome and is still in Firefox at the moment) is TinyMCE based. Everything else should be using the common editor, which I don't think is based on TinyMCE. But like dconnet, I don't work on that part of the code. A cursory look suggests Electron.
  13. @CalS The Boolean part comes from that pwever wants to join the results of that reminder-based query with the results of tag:ongoing
  14. @Jose Gonzalez Unfortunately no, my understanding is that the focus is on getting the new web client (in which code blocks work) ready for personal accounts. I don't think there's any release time set for that.
×
×
  • Create New...