Mishkafofer

My 2 Cents: Allow each user to decide what is "updated" means. Present user with list of options: tags, body, text etc etc and some kind of time line to see number of changes done over a period. This can be a game changer for many of us.

What kind of browser you use for web access? try different browsers including non chrome based such as Firefox.

Not sure about the speed thing. I was under the impression that Evernote deliberately made a choice not to be Notion-like with its myriad features but instead be simpler and more robust. For me, the danger zone is data reliability and data retrieval. I'd rather miss out on that AI train than have notes with unreadable or missing attachments.

I may be wrong, but it seems like every release includes a fix to existing functionality. I am not a programmer, but I expect new things to break or to be improved. However, the degradation of old and basic functionality concerns me. For instance, the latest release, 10.117.2, fixes an issue where drag and drop functionality was not working, preventing users from reordering and adding content to notes. Release 10.116.3 fixes an issue where the wrong note was selected and displayed after its creation. It's strange to me that this happens. Isn't there some kind of protection or stringent review process before touching tried and tested code? Am I wrong to expect a certain level of trustworthiness from basic functionality? Add new shiny stuff. Ok, i can expect it to be wonky. To this day EN warns about AI. Ok, fair enough. What about warning that drag and drop is going sour like milk? Here is my favorite "Oops i did it again" moment from release 10.113.5: Fixed an issue where sometimes changing the note and updating an attachment in an external editor, the update was reflected in the wrong note. If only a clean reinstall with some kind of magical uninstaller would heal my pain.

yep, that's Evernote. Even on my android phone where i choose to keep download version, it still lags. On PC it better.

I am not saying the worst happened. Clearly recovery / discovery procedure is not clear enough. Hopefully EN can make it more clear.

I think this post demands more attention from major participants on the forum. This is the "nightmare" scenario we all fear.

After reading many topics on the forum, my understanding is that reinstalling Evernote on PC solves many issues related to locale database. So, my question is: how is the database hosted by EN online immune to corruption, but the PC-based database degrades in many cases? What also bothers me is that the decision to reinstall the PC app (thus solving issues with database) is dependent on whether the user notices weird behavior. So, if a user didn't notice a thing and gets degraded performance, tough luck.

Tried to understand who stands behind upnote and what allows it to offer this price. Can't find a thing. If anything, Super Notes looks better. Makes more sense to use Obsidian or even Tiddlywiki + Google Drive / Dropbox. but that just me.

This feature exists in One Note and works great (tip for EN team to see how it should be done). One of the few things that One Note done right.

My PC and Web client work fine. Even checked videos on web client, they load immediately. Location: Middle East (have no idea where server is). 2 cents: EN is not redirecting clients to other working server. If you connected to local server and its down, tough luck. What if you opened VPN and choose other location? Try Middle East or Easter Europe.

I am on Pro plan. I prefer that BS would add features to Pro plan instead cutting down Personal plan. It doesn't make me feel better than personal plan users getting a reduced version. Suggested Pro feature: Backups to Amazon or other cloud vendor for free.

What about EN web? How it performers? Not saying web app is the perfect replacement but for the time being, may be it can help.

It OCRed PDF. Not sure about JPG. One drive and Google drive offer this capability. I use One drive online search due to the fact it scans inside PDF and OFFICE files.

Google drive done OCR for long time. What's different in this implementation?