Jump to content


Level 5*
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by jefito

  1. Appears to work correctly in prerelease. Thanks, Everfolks.
  2. We are seeing it the same way. I have Evernote up all day and the chance that the last specific notebook is "All Notes" is not likely. Thus requiring the use of one of these "hot keys." I think when you go select your cycling tag it should show deselect all selections and show you all the notes with that tag, unless I also (my choice by holding "ctrl") select a notebook. I would prefer it not assume the last notebook I used; maybe 2 hours ago or 10 secs should be used to limit my results, unless I requested it by some command. Ah, I see. But i"m not sure that I agree. I picked that notebook; I might have done so 2 hours ago, but it might have been 2 seconds ago, also. The flow sort of mirrors the search grammar: pick your search context (i.e., notebook), which starts a new search, and then pick your filters (i.e. tags and/or attributes), which refine the search. So I'm used to it, and it conveys a certain sense of consistency to my mind, and so I wouldn't want it to change behavior, though it might be one of those 50/50 propositions vs. your preference; there may be no absolute right or wrong answer here. Anyways, this brings to mind one thing that I would like to see: if I Ctrl+click on a new notebook (or Shift-click), I would like to see my Tag/Attribute/text/etc. search items retained, rather than blowing them all away as happens now; current simple click on a notebook could clear them as it does now. On that we agree.
  3. Almost sounds like a badge of honor. Make up some t-shirts!!
  4. Ah, but you cannot search two notebooks with one search; only one or all. At least with the current search functionality, that is. It just happens to be what I use most; other seasoned (grizzled? ) users might have a different preference. Evernote couple put a preference in the Options, but their predilection seems to be to keep the number of options small. Glad for that. You're welcome. Like I said; sorry about not being clear. I can see all the tags (all visible all the time), I just don't want the the notebook from above to remain selected; if I wanted it to remain selected I should use "ctrl." I'm not sure that you're trying to do here. If I click on "All Notebooks", and then click on tag "Cycling", I get all Cycling-tagged notes in all notebooks. If I click on a specific notebook, and then click on tag "Cycling", I get all Cycling-tagged notes just that notebook. This is in the Windows client. Is that what you're seeing?
  5. Probably should have posted this in the Windows forum, then. Nevertheless... I use the notebook-specific search most of the time. However, if you want to do an all-notebooks search, you can use the F6 or Ctrl+Alt+F shortcut keys to start a new search with All Notebooks as the context. To show all tags, regardless of notebook, you need to disable the "Hide unassigned tags" option (or conversely, enable the "Show Unassigned Tags" option in the View menu.
  6. If I understand properly, this would result in multiple levels of notebooks represented by tag hierarchy. I don't think that you have. The suggestion is to allow (but not force) search to be able to honor the tag hierarchy, without affecting the current system of stacks, notebooks or tags. In other words, this mode of search would allow you to search for tag "A", and match not only explicit matches of tag "A" (which is what it does now), but also notes tagged with subtags of "A". Note that this is something I'm suggesting could be useful, but I've never see any posting by Evernote folks that would lead me to think that they're considering it.
  7. Go to the top of the forum most appropriate to your query, and click on the button labeled "New Topic". Please ask your questions there.
  8. Was just going to post that. Congrats, Evernote, and to all the hard working folks who make it all happen. And also to the 3rd-party developers who are filling in the landscape around the big pachyderm.
  9. Oh, the possibilities were endless... *Ba-daBoomp!!*
  10. You haven't specified which client you use. This is available in the Windows client (Ctrl+. If you have questions that pertain to a specific client, please post them in the appropriate sub-forum. You're more likely to get a better answer, and others who look for answers relevant to that client are more likely to find them.
  11. OK, I'll do that next time. Will d/l the new one, no worries.
  12. Actually, I get this any time I try to run TuskTools Calendar. Shut it all down, and restart, same thing. Also for shutting down Tusk Tools Sync... Edit: back in business, no more unhandled exception. Thanks, Phil.
  13. I downloaded and installed the the latest version, Attempted to open the Options dialog, and got an unhandled exception error. After clicking Continue in the error message, the Options dialog opened up. Here's the error detail: See the end of this message for details on invoking just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box. ************** Exception Text ************** System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. at MPN.TuskToolsCalendar.OptionsDialog.LoadOptions() at MPN.TuskToolsCalendar.OptionsDialog.OptionsDialog_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.SetVisibleCore(Boolean value) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.set_Visible(Boolean value) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoopInner(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.ThreadContext.RunMessageLoop(Int32 reason, ApplicationContext context) at System.Windows.Forms.Application.RunDialog(Form form) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.ShowDialog(IWin32Window owner) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.ShowDialog() at MPN.TuskToolsCalendar.MainCalForm.BarButtonOptions_ItemClick(Object sender, ItemClickEventArgs e) at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarItem.OnClick(BarItemLink link) at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarBaseButtonItem.OnClick(BarItemLink link) at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarItemLink.OnLinkClick() at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarItemLink.OnLinkAction(BarLinkAction action, Object actionArgs) at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarButtonItemLink.OnLinkAction(BarLinkAction action, Object actionArgs) at DevExpress.XtraBars.BarItemLink.OnLinkActionCore(BarLinkAction action, Object actionArgs) at DevExpress.XtraBars.ViewInfo.BarSelectionInfo.ClickLink(BarItemLink link) at DevExpress.XtraBars.ViewInfo.BarSelectionInfo.UnPressLink(BarItemLink link) at DevExpress.XtraBars.Controls.CustomLinksControl.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) ************** Loaded Assemblies ************** mscorlib Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5446 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll ---------------------------------------- TuskToolsCalendar Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/TuskToolsCalendar.exe ---------------------------------------- Microsoft.VisualBasic Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 8.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/ ---------------------------------------- System Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5447 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/ ---------------------------------------- System.Windows.Forms Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5446 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/ ---------------------------------------- System.Drawing Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/ ---------------------------------------- System.Runtime.Remoting Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/ ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraBars.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraBars.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.Utils.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.Utils.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraEditors.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraEditors.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.Data.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.Data.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2.Core Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2.Core.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraLayout.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraLayout.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2.Extensions Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2.Extensions.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraTreeList.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraTreeList.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.XtraScheduler.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.Xpo.v10.2 Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.Xpo.v10.2.DLL ---------------------------------------- System.Xml Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/ ---------------------------------------- System.Data Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_32/System.Data/ ---------------------------------------- System.Configuration Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/ ---------------------------------------- DevExpress.Xpo.v10.2.Providers Assembly Version: Win32 Version: CodeBase: file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/More%20Productive%20Now/TuskTools%20Calendar/DevExpress.Xpo.v10.2.Providers.DLL ---------------------------------------- System.Web.Services Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Web.Services/ ---------------------------------------- System.Data.SqlServerCe Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 3.0.5300.0 CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Data.SqlServerCe/ ---------------------------------------- System.Transactions Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.4927 (NetFXspW7.050727-4900) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_32/System.Transactions/ ---------------------------------------- System.EnterpriseServices Assembly Version: Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400) CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_32/System.EnterpriseServices/ ----------------------------------------
  14. Is this something that fails for specific URLs and/or conditions, or is it erratic?
  15. You didn't say which client you are using; it's generally better to post in the forums specific to yoru Evernote client. In the Windows client, one way to handle your scenario is to select a note that has the tags that you want, and also select the note that you wish to tag similarly, and then press Ctrl+Alt+T to bring up the Assign Tags dialog, which lets you give both notes the same tags.
  16. Yeah, I can see how the techie-geek-talk bit could be described as "cryptic" *g* It's probably not something that most users need to worry about. The takeaway, though, is what Peter said, which is what I was referring to as non-cryptic.
  17. Rather than keep these in separate notebooks, you could tag your receipts with month (e.g., "January", "February", etc.) and year (e.g. "2010", "2011", etc.). You can then keep them in a single notebook.
  18. This has been requested before. Probably involves a whole set of UIs, so that the various multi-level outlining styles are supported. No idea whether it's in the works or not, short-term or long-term. In the Windows client at least, this has gotten better. There's still the occasional corner case that pops up for me. The best thing that you can do is post, in the forum appropriate to the client that you are using, cases where this breaks down or doesn't behave as you expect. A much-discussed topic. No idea whether Evernote is planning deeper hierarchical structuring or not. You can search the forum for existing discussion on the topic.
  19. It's not all that cryptic: what it means is that they have a specification (see the link), that the "filename" search operator will not go away (because it's part fo the spec), that all clients do not at this time meet the spec, but that they will eventually.
  20. Nested tags in Evernote are mainly for organizational purposes, and not for exposing semantic hierarchies. It's been that way since Evernote added the nesting capabilities, and was acknowledged by them at the time. And they understand the difference. That tag nesting exists doesn't make them non-useful; they are exactly as useful as before nesting came around, but now you can organize them, which makes them more manageable, so long as you don't fall into the trap of assuming that they behave hierarchically with respect to searching. Auto adding tag parents is problematic; in my opinion; it's coming at the problem from the wrong end. I think that enhancing search to allow for hierarchical functionality would be the way to go: i.e., the ability to search for notes labelled by a tag and any of its subtags would give users the ability to treat their tag trees as semantic hierarchies, which seems to be what some of them want.
  21. Which client. You can certainly do this in the Windows client.
  22. Click on "All Notes" (je ne sais le mot en Francais ) Open up your Tags tree, and make sure that you are displaying all tags (Show Unassigned Tags). Now look for tags with a count of 0. These should be able to be safely deleted, but just to be sure, click on any tag that you think you want to delete. If no notes show up in the note list, you should be OK. Right click on the tag, and select "Delete" It should prompt you to affirm the deletion. Note that this will also delete all subtags of the deleted tag, so be careful.
  23. Are you talking about "tags"? Which client are you using?
  • Create New...