AlbertR

Great! May I invite you to discussion EN-Teams account to collect/view/comment issues (bugs and wishes)? And: You're free to catch up things from EN10 - missing features (from beloved Legacy) 😉

Hmm, if EN is able to count our doings even in finer measures (L usage, Tag usage, ...), it shouldn't be a problem to give us stats... OK, after some thoughts about, what's about some changes in my suggestion? Who will get Writer? In a first step all Level 3..5 and Expert forum users ... if they are willing to help because it will take some time to collect already known issues 😉 Anyone who want's to be part of the Writer team sends a "Give me access" message that has to be granted by Admins. I propose that Level 3..5 and Experts have proven enouph not to abuse goals of such a indicent tracker. I think it will be no more than one or two dozens of us who would help. Who will get Reader? Forum users with at least Level 2 All other newbees can be handled like ever by forum users Readers cannot abuse anything. But it was a bad idea, to enable Readers by a similar process. It might be much easier to offer one free account. So the Admins have to handle only n(Writers)+1 accounts. To close the door of changing anything on the Reader account I've to add a topic to Prerequisites EN has to disable access to the Account page for the Reader account to disable changes (i.e. of the password 😉) AFAIK the Forums are driven by an external service. Is it even impossible for you (as a moderator) to move threads around the forum groups? To be used as an issue tracker, this forum has at least one problem: It shows no thread-ID (maybe in front of the thread subject). It would be much easier to navigate through and maintain overview over a forum group if users can see this ID and us it to reference threads. Example: This thread here should be named "§150537 EN-Teams account to collect/view/comment issues (bugs and wishes)?" "§150537" should be inserted automatically before the title in every display If a user types "§" during inserting text anywhere, the editor should work like currently if you type "@": with every following character, possible continuations are displayed and to ease the input of the complete ID. If an ID is input, the complete ID and titel should be displayed as a link to the thread like §150537 EN-Teams account to collect/view/comment issues (bugs and wishes)? This is exactly my problem with the forum to be used as an issue tracker: There are too many users who do not care for overview. If a Teams account based issue tracker is maintained by people like your and some others who know what's to do, this cannot go out of control (Remember: only some Writers and many consumers) Great - I think many of us have (for several needs) such standard answers. But it's your personal work and your personal list. Wouldn't be fine to have this list available for and maintained also by others? Such a list might be available as a notebook "FAQ" in our issue tracker containing i.e. notes like "§17 Open note in new window" Hey - Tags are already invented 😉 Yep - would do it the same way. But would honor any idea to help me. So I keep hoping for an answer sooner or later... OK, the idea of a user-driven issue tracker might be born because of the non-existing official Support this time. If the newly formed Support team will offer a similar system there is really no need for a user-driven support.

Maybe - but I suggest to search for "tag:Santander"

Sorry - that's a vague generalisation. I for example would like to live with grand-parents and children. Am I No-one? 😉 EOT @all-here?

Fine. It withdraws a statement in offical Blog that says "... will stop working" - which means (in my eyes) also "... stop searching local data" or simply "... stop starting" Yep - but simply exiting does not need a re-login later. Translation of username to numerical userID to locate local data is stored anywhere (in Registry?). If Evernote.exe has an internal time-bomb that fires on 23.03.24 - Puh - this date was a long term decision. Build 6.25.3.9348 (309348) has been built in December 2021 and signed on 14.12.21... Finally agree 😐

No - in my case such thoughts are only to widen my knowledge. Maybe I can use is elsewhere... 😉

THX again - this is why I love these groups 🙂

Airplane mode is not a good solution. You take all your apps to the airplane. Can firewall rules encapsulate only specific apps to airplane mode? Yep - nothing of real benefit to work with... Best solution as a backup source for any reason might be to have a read-only sync. But I think EN will not do this 🤷‍♂️

I think - no. We do not know any keys to change online settings (like server name or any other related switches). But it's a good idea 😉 @all: Is any Windows/networking crack here who knows how to cut an application off from internet while Windows itself (and all other apps) keeps beeing online? I just made a quick test: I exited Legacy, went offline, started Legacy - No problem (as assumed 😉). Exporting notebooks and any other operation are OK. I tried this with EN10: Start was OK - but exporting one or more notes that contain attachments is impossible. EN10 needs an internet connection - WHY? Data (note content and attachment) is available 🤔

Bingo - it resurrected from death. 👍

Along with working here in the groups, reading much Bla-Bla and struggling with links to already know issues (where and how can I find them?, ...), I suggest the following: EN itself should drive a Teams account to extend our forum groups We users and EN itself should collect issues that come up and|or are already listed in groups like Evernote for Windows Issues (Versions 10.0 and above) and others This might have many advantages: EN-Teams members (users) can use all features of EN to find, comment and manage issues This will easy (and later replace?) work with many forum groups EN is able to comment ... to annouce things like "in work", "fixed in", "on hold because...", "never", ... EN itself proves that its own product is capable of being used in this way ... and how easy this is... Prerequisites EN has to settle up a "paid" EN-Teams account should not be a problem😉 EN staff people will be Administrators of the account (more than on possible) How could daily work be set up? Administrators set up Spaces (collections of notebooks to be managed globally) Administrators create Notebooks within Spaces Administrators invite users to become team members Write-enabled users ("Writers") can add notes (issues), comments (note content) and tags They are content-creators Read-only users ("Readers") may do exactly this... They are content-consumers Who will get Writer? In a first step all Level 3..5 and Expert forum users ... if they are willing to help because it will take some time to collect already known issues 😉 Who will get Reader? Forum users with at least Level 2 All other newbees can be handled like ever by forum users What should be written? Every small incident should become a new note with short but meaningful title If would be fine to assign a unique incident number (in front of the title) Problem/wish description Solution (if available later) Some (well defined) tags shall help to categorize the issues Do I see any difficuties? Yes - of course ... 🤔 Tags cannot be ordered hierarchicalle in Teams accounts. This is not a big problem if tags are well defined and will be used according to clear rules because you can limit your work to not-so-many tags... Might be one of the first Issues in such a system 😉 It cannot be disallowed to add new tags In such a big Teams user community it would be helpful limit tag usage to avoid wild grouth. ... the next Issue in such a system Discussions are not easy to handle Whereas a forum adds every new post to the end of a thread, a note can be edited elsewhere... Can be an advantage if all Writes use the same rules to manage tag content (by using a Template?) Administration of users is not easy for huge groups You cannot give "all forum user" access to the account because every each user has to be added and invited. But this might be automated on server site (EN) ... something like the procedure to enter closed Facebook groups: forum user clicks a button to "Request access to issue tracker", Administrator gets involved an has to click "OK, Reader", "OK, Write" or ignore it. EN10 should be enabled to work with two account in parallel OK - it's wish of mine since months - but might be worked around if by using the WEB app only to access the issue tracker 😁 I'd like to get some comments on this idea - not only from users. It would a nice to get an offical statement from @Federico Simionato. THX

Me too 😞 Even that I run 6.25.3.9348 (309348) Public (CE Build ce-62.6.10954) - the last Legacy client I've seen so far on Windows. It shows "0% HTTP request failed, code: 403, error: Forbidden" in activity log since yesterday. And not only while trying to sync. If I try to simply connect to an other account the login box tells me "Connection impossible - try again later" (my words - I'm on a German system 😉) Interesting: This is true only on my (important) working PC. An other one works well so far... @EN-Admins: Is it a temporary problem and will be fixed or did you really cut down these clients immediately after announcing 4 weeks to die?

Again this is BS. ... Yep - was a reply to PEs last sentence and should emphasize exactly that 😉 - sorry.

Confusing: I went offline assigned tag ">>6" to some notes navitated to other notes (changed notes are not seen in note list) reconnected to iNet ==> Error came up because any note has an open RTE room 😞 Next try: the same but closed EN before reconnecting to iNet (to view execution of the Receipe) ==> All OK (because EN closes all rooms on exit?) So OK, theoretical WAR (WordARound) found - but unusable. It's unpredictable how long I should wait to re-open EN because Receipes work on foreign servers... It's a bad solution to close/open an App to avoid its fails. And: during my offline-tests I found many notes beeing not synced - after at least 3 weeks of working with this account (of 11.400 notes). I really need an indicator to see whether EN is able to work offline (means: "all syncs done"!)

Oups - have to correct me a bit because of a thinking fail: I thought of disconnecting internet after I've assigned the tags 😞 Cutting of the internet just before working like this might help - I'll try this. Even if I will not like it. During such offline times, I cannot browse the web, receive eMails, ...

This is not possible because I have to navigate to other notes in the App and wait some (unpredictable in my experience) time to allow the app to close the RTE rooms. Because the RTE rooms are open on server site (they control access to the notes around clients and API access requests), pausing the internet is not a solution. Maybe at least one of the following might help EN should offer a sync mode that collects necessary syncs to explicit times ("sync button") of course possible with RTE. But for the price of not really instant sync of each note change to all devices - but users with real workflows to handle notes normally do not need such immediate syncs. We should have the choice. EN should enhance their API in any way to handle RTE rooms ([silent} wait for close, ...)

Will not get true if replicated 100 times. Even after working with EN10 for weeks (I run more than one account 😉), it is slow on average HW, shows mistakes in well formatted content, occupies to much space on average screens and makes it hard to keep overview over large note lists.

... in > 10 years of heavily using such type of syncing, I got a handful probs like this. ... that leads to hundreds of problems whilst moving moving tags around and using API services. On example: I use Receips that search for notes with assigned tags like ">>1", ">>2", ">>w" and ">>m". Having found them, their Reminder date will be set to 1 day, 2 days, a week or month in counted from today before the tags are removed. With Legacy no problem: After syncing all notes are free to be worked on on server site. NO problem seen ever. After the next sync (some minutes later) all affected notes have been adjusted correct. With RTE: Problems nearly all the time ... because every note/tag is tried to be synced immediately which triggers the Receipe to work along with the note remains open too long it it's "RTE room" Execution is broken, an error is mailed to me, Receip is paused for 1,2,5,10,60 minutes... If I assign such a tag to a bundle of notes (to procrastinate ToDos 😉), the problem escalates because RTE syncs at any time in random sequence whereas the clients keep more notes open in RTE rooms -> unusable... I need such a Receipe because (even in Legacy) it was not possible to change Reminder dates for a bundle of notes in one operation (have to go to each note separately to adopt it). But changing a Reminder date in Legacy is easy: Just type in the date in field. With EN10 you have to use a boring date picker dialog. ... and a coffin to service providers like Filterize and many users who rely on backgound workflows that are based on the API. The new sync makes it necesssary to adapt the API! But is not done so far... But somebody who stook bd while all that was described/discussed/complained here and sent to support can know!

OK - so let's make it an option 😉

Can be mitigated only by EN 😉. They should try to identify URL token after each word during paste operations. If found, it should be converted to a real <a href="token">token</a> construct. But to calm down some others who are pitched with every naming of "Legacy": It did the job better - but not perfect. If the URL token is embedded within "()" or "<>" (as often seen in eMail addresses), the token is not recognized during paste operations 🙄. But it is OK to no more change Legacy - if EN10 will get the desired enhancement. 🙏

After Filterize has been closed before some weeks you may try Make (formerly "Integromat") to achieve what you are searching for. You have to define a so-called "Scenario" to search for notes (i.e. by searching for a specific tag within a notebook) and iterate along the result list to set new note titles.

FYI: I added this also as support #3839476 - hope they can help on this before Legacy dies...

If I add an Excel .xlsm file (spreadsheet with macros) as an attachment, it is available and can be opened by Double-click or ...->Open command. Like with .xlsx files (normal spreasheets), it is saved to a subfolder of your personal documents-tree ...\Dokumente\Evernote\...\external-edits\...\...\ But: If you change anything within the XLSM document and save it, EN does not read it back to the note to replace the current attachment This all works fine for XLSX documents (which is described in Preview spreadsheets in notes – Evernote Help & Learning) It is a substantial need for me to be able to edit XLSM documents (as it was possible with no problem in Legacy)

Go to your "Account information" (or whatever it is named in an English UI) You will come to your account administration page in your browser. There you'll find a link to manage your eMail address:

I had this effect today with 10.77.3 after re-installing EN10. So I started my PDF viewer explicitely and opened the "untitled" (or "unknown"?) attachment there I saved it locally. Then I closed the PDF viewer and restarted EN (not with [X] - use File->Exit!) and the problem was gone. Maybe EN10 needs some time to find the propper handling app for attachments...