Razmataz

HTML export is not working: all attachments are show as "unknown attachment" HTML export is not working: hotlinks to attachments point to NIL Context menu of attachments (e.g. EXCEL or PDF) have copy and cut grayed out Number of notes that can be selected is limited to 100, thus re-orgs of notebooks or tags are extremely time consuming If sections are expanded (un-collapsed) for reading, the change-time-stamp is updated If encrypted text is decrypted (but not altered), the change-time-stamp is updated PDF printing from the web interface is showing partial text only, with a (frozen) scroll bar The view mode of attachments (Title, Preview,…) is set to the option specified in systems settings only once, on import/adding it. Subsequently, we have to change every one of them manually That default setting is not applied to PDF-s, not even on import/adding it searching for a term typed in into the search mask clears the already set search tags typographic issues within code blocks: "->" becomes "→" etc.

This is a personal attack and has nothing to do with the thread. The dispute was about whether it is true or not, that in V10 "Nothing is 'broken' and there's nothing to fix." Zero help to other: is a lie. A lot less than you, but a number of times, one can dig them out. And I consider pointing out problems as help to others, too. This is a plain personal attack. You are bullying me like so many others. I'll let you be (just as the moderators do). This is your forum, you own it. You have chased away a number of people already. Reign on.

A very reasonable stance, @MvdH, thank you. You don't deny the problems, and that's a good approach. I wish you were the moderator.

No, that’s propaganda and your spin. I don’t want legacy back. I want the numerous bugs in V10 fixed! You equate that with legacy. That's ridiculous. You can't wind out of this: there are bugs, there is a lot to fix in V10. And paying customer are within their rights to expect that. Again: you are the MODERATOR! Stick to the truth!

@gazumped, that's the problem with some of you on this forum, you see. It is clear that legacy is gone, and no amount of complaining will bring it back. It is true, that BS/EN has the right to double prices and they could even quadruple them. It is true that forum is not there for the disappointed user to simply complain. And it is true that valuable help is given here to people who have problems. But is is also true that the help often comes with belittling comments, some of the dominating forists even outright bully other people, who genuinely have problems. So the these people have to endure this style, because there is no other way to get help, as support does not exist (for practical purposes). You understand your job as having to be complacent with EN and having to down-talk or even negate any problems others might have. But your mantra is true, too. But it isn't true and it is an egregious lie to say You read this forum. There are literally dozens of broken things with V10. Not even counting the missing and promised (but not delivered) features. Features that are there and have been implemented, are broken. Broken to the bone. There are dozens of examples for anyone to see. You say you are not paid by Evernote. But even if you were, such a blatant distortion of the facts would be appalling. From a volunteer it is not just appalling, it is mind-boggling and shocking. And as a moderator you are supposed (at least by conventional rules) to be neutral, fair, and a guardian of the facts and truth. "Nothing is 'broken' and there's nothing to fix." could not be farther from the truth. Why are you doing this?

In an open market, such car companies may face a bit of hard time. Even if they hire brand ambassadors, who deny all of the complaints.

This is an interesting analogy. The Mona Lisa is masterpiece, world famous and everybody knows it. The new painting, however, … Or did I misunderstand your analogy?

What? There is no notebook "assigned" either, if you just File/Import it. Then it gets the notebook name (perhaps from the file name, I don't know). Why not the same behavior upon double clicking, for consistency? I stand by my story, there needs to be consistency in an app. It is a bad design to expect that users think about the context first, before they do something, because the same function is behaving differently, depending on the context or environment. This is a productivity app! And inconsistency kills productivity. Or do you find it great, too, that in a note one cannot right-click a random attachment to copy it (like in every other app on any platform) but you can do the same using the top-line edit menu where the option is not grayed out (or just press CTRL-C)? There are dozens of inconsistencies like that in V10, working against habits. You seem to enjoy them though. This is really great for you, congratulations!

Hah, what kind of kindergarten is that? If one mentions, boo-boo legacy: no help! Mind your manners! But if you say "V10 is great, but it can be even greater" and "pretty please!" then they listen? I am a paying customer, for crying out loud, and have been for many-many years! Currently I am paying one of the, if not, the highest price in the industry in this category. But as long as I am locked in, I'll have to come to senses, or else! How nice is that?

So, what term would have been more appropriate, then? Downgrade, perhaps?

Well, well, well. Amusing. But totally off the mark. Old DOS batch scripts are still running under W11, so workflows are not broken. And there a subsystems that give you a nice DOS environment. And I do not know of any major function that worked under DOS but is totally broken in Windows, let alone dozens or mayhaps even hundreds. It is not comparable, I humbly submit.

I you double click or open the ENEX file, notes are imported into the default notebook. If, however, you use in the EN app /File/Import menu item and select the same ENEX file, notes will be imported into a new notebook named "(Imported) original notebook name". EDIT: If you exported by notebooks, that is. I haven't tried anything else. I do not see a reason for this inconsistent behavior, but I am sure some will argue here that this is great (you can even guess who that will be). To me it is inconsistent and thus I avoid directly (outside of EN) opening an ENEX file.

He/she/it probably is not human, judging from the ever so slightly critical remarks posted. Clearly, humans are "V10 aficionado"-s. I might must be an AI instance, myself…

Probably even less now that legacy has been switched off. 😂 So EN (and their representatives here) were right after all: a negligible user base on legacy. Q.E.D.

But of course, but of course. Bend it as you please.