-
Posts
746 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Events
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Everything posted by AlbertR
-
New coming: Table of contents on Evernote
AlbertR replied to Cristiano478's topic in Evernote General Discussions
Whow - and they call it the "clipboard". I hope this means really "Windows clipboard" with text and address π. It would be a killing feature to be able to insert such an URL to other programs like Outlook, Excel and Word and see it there as a link to a section in an EN-note... See also: 049 - Paste internal links as complete HTLM link (with title and URL) into foreign applications -
How to prevent EN to assume each file name is an URL?
AlbertR replied to Farbauti's topic in Evernote General Discussions
Yes and no (after diving deeper...). If a string that starts with evernote:///view/... is ... ... a valid internal link to a note in the currently open account, it is converted to an URL showing the note title as text and the address as the link behind π ... a valid internal link to a note in an other account, it seems to be converted to an URL - but cannot show the note title. A never ending loading-indicator shows up ... until the other account shares the note with the currently open account π ... an (syntactically) invalid internal link the string is inserted without any modification to an URL (OK) So all-in-all handling of evernote:///view/-links is OK. OK - with one exception: See 049 - Paste internal links as complete HTLM link (with title and URL) into foreign applications π -
OK, after some back and forth I was forwared to Convert local notebooks - so it was a "Handbook-not-read-error" in case of retaining content of local notebook π. Great - but also a great desaster: It's possible to open a local Legacy database with these registry hacks (it's so simple that I'm annoyed I didn't find it myself) But: After some minutes the complete EvernotePath is deleted from disk - all locally stored EN (Legacy) data is lost π π‘ So is no more an option... Even EN10 (re-)installs never removed Legacy's data. Now EN-Legacy itself kills its data (but keeps running - for what?) π€ π(IIRC EN promised "your data is yours..." π - now our local data was ours)
-
New coming: Table of contents on Evernote
AlbertR replied to Cristiano478's topic in Evernote General Discussions
Sorry, not for me (and my screen is really wide π ). Could you please supply a screen shot? -
How to prevent EN to assume each file name is an URL?
AlbertR replied to Farbauti's topic in Evernote General Discussions
It seems like EN converts anything that looks like a domain name (like StartWatchTicket.sh ;-)) or starts with http[s]:// to an URL. Unfortunately all other that should be converted to an URL (like file:///... or even evernote://...) is not recognized to be a valid hyperlink address π) -
Yes at all... Already done (see headline). The trick might be to use a special server address by cheating the registry. I promised not to tell anyone about that (if it is possible π) Our (it's not my problem π€) hope is/was that the login server is not responding for the moment because message says "Try again later..."
-
<after having sent this issue to support and got well-formulated automated answers...> I know that Legacy has been decommissioned end of March and how to install and use EN10. Itβs OK that Legacy is no more able to sync with the server(s). If I try to log in to EN Legacy, it tells me that connection to server is not possible, and I should re-try it later: So whatβs βlaterβ? We had some local notebooks in Legacy that are no longer accessible with EN10. Because it is not able to log in to EN Legacy, we cannot export the notebook content to ENEX format. Moreover the Legacy's local notes database is our last-chanche backup as long as we meet some problems with EN10's handling of attachments... So we need a possibility to log in to EN Legacy. Is there really no chance?
-
That's a good solution - and discloses the inner structure of the feature: All collapsable functionality to bound to the upperst level of the note text. If you try to insert a bulleted list inside a table cell, it's not collapsable... This is true for headlines also: You may use Headline text inside table cells but text sections beneath these headlines are not collapsable.
-
Did line spacing just change? EN 10.84.3 Windows
AlbertR replied to janndk's topic in Evernote General Discussions
Another reason to get a possibility to adjust spacings on user's site... As I read the headline, I hoped to get smaller spacings in note list lines. I'm loosing hope to get a compacter display. π -
I'm used to use such lists since ever - most often to explain technical topics. Yep. It's implemented with scripting inside EN's text editor - and not with <details><summary>...</summary></details> directly in HTML (which would work very fast π) After having seen 10.83.4 with an update on the problem, I reworked my https://tinyurl.com/missing-in-EN10 to use collapsable sections (headers and bulleted list) as a test medium. Unfortunately you cannot see collapsable lists in this publicly shared version of the note (collapsing is not supported there π). But if you import this note to your account, you can see (and play) with collapsable items within EN...
-
Clear search box after WIN + SHIFT + F shortcut
AlbertR replied to Display Name 1's question in General Feature Requests
OK, but in this case, the current search phrase should be appended automatically by a simple Blank π -
Unfortunately EN only describes what a rate limit is (see Rate Limits) - but they do not describe how it is counted π I meet this message often with my scenarios (mainly to adjust Reminder times) and asked support for help (better description, tools to observe current usage, enlarge limits, ...) but got nothing except the above link... Most often a RATE_LIMIT_REACHED error comes up with "RTE room has already been open for note". This means that a note cannot be processed because the interactive client has locked the note for API access even some time after you released it in your app. On Make's site scenario is re-executed if such a problem is encountered. At first time after 5 minutes. If it this second try fails, scenario is re-executed after another 5 minutes. Then after an 10 minutes, Then after an hour, then after 3 hours, ... In most cases my scenario succeeded after the 2nd or 3rd try. But this is a only a (working, but worse) workaround. From my point of view, EN should widen the limits in any way, close RTE rooms faster or (best) find a way to enable API access in parallel to interactive work. This in turn might be solved with an explicit sync which they refuse to implement π€
-
V10: Total Disaster or just a little worse!
AlbertR replied to Cristiano478's topic in Evernote General Discussions
My main reason to still keep using Evernote is my huge note repository - Well maintained with crreation dates, titles, attachment names, commenting images, tags, ... All tries to move that -together with my workflow- to an other environment failed so far. So I've to continue with EN. But I'm optimistic that they will fix my complaints in the foreseeable future - hopefully π -
V10: Total Disaster or just a little worse!
AlbertR replied to Cristiano478's topic in Evernote General Discussions
No, never seen this on Windows - so Apple users are to blame for the misery... π -
V10: Total Disaster or just a little worse!
AlbertR replied to Cristiano478's topic in Evernote General Discussions
Yep - but this is a personal opinion and depends on user needs. New, occasional users and those who might use new "all-in-one" features like calendar, tasks and life-links to Youtube will like it. Professional with well-defined workflows that depend on quick responses, well formatted note lists, API extensions (and therefore relyable syncs) have ongoing problems. I count myself to the professionals - and feel somewhat disappointed from EN's conduct of handling this group of users. I really hope that they will find ways to improve note list functionality (sort by Reminder times, show and sort Reminder done times) space requirements (around note lists, tables and images) UI inconveniences (note lists hidden, by notes, favorites horitzontally above all, silly dialogs to change reminder and other dates, ...) "user friedly" time format (I would prefer a fix format in all cases like "dd.mm.yy hh:mm") and (last but not least) an option to work offline until I press a Sync button π I do not cry for speed and lower prices. And I appreciate some of the new ideas like Backlinks, Life Links and the very new Files view. π -
Seems like an incomplete search index and|or incomplete sync. We have notebooks with 7.500 notes in sum whereby the biggest contains 1.550 notes and no problem to search within... One idea might be: Try to export the desired notebook to an ENEX file. This will force all notes to be synced during the export. I hope this will also complete the index... But you have to take some time: Exporting thousands of notes is much slower than in older versions π