Jump to content

Larry_C

Evernote Certified Consultant
  • Content Count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Neutral

About Larry_C

Profile Information

  • Subscription
    PREMIUM

Recent Profile Visitors

1,702 profile views
  1. Shane D, can you please provide a link to the relocated discussion?!
  2. I have to add my voice. While I guess it is not strictly the editor, I even tried to look for another place to report this but the community search does not appear to even allow me to easily find another place to post. So here it is. Please do something to include stacks in the sidebar. I went looking for the stack and could not find it. The stack is there when you view the Notebooks My notebook list Larry 2019AP04 19:30
  3. What is infuriating about this problem is that there seems to be no development sympathy for this. They just announced spaces which is currently only available to EN Business. Formatting runs through the WHOLE product set & range. Surely if it was not created with a robust editing engine, the time has come that a cross-platform edit engine would be a good investment to make something that is not only more robust and even more effective and expandable.
  4. Thanks for the history. But think the issue is that a) a change was announced and b.) feedback sought (at least I think so) and then NOTHING. NO communication, at least not in the forum where the announcement was made. In any product, for engineers to work in isolation or on what THEY think the users want, without two way communication is a short course to further complaints.
  5. Don't confuse release notes with communication on development progress and feedback on that progress. I've had a program manager (someone who has MANY project managers working for them) read the two articles. The luckman212 article is a progress report on development, communicating to those interested what and why they are doing something with products. The DTLow / cifip article is a set of release notes - what has been done (and "what has not" I notice reading the last part). The later is NOT what the discussion is about. The former IS about communicating ones plans on what, why and how. Now I have determined, based on earlier posts / reply, that THIS forum (the one we are in) is probably the not one that those discussing or wishing to discuss progress should be in. Those interested should be in the beta forums. I am beta testing Mac EN and thought I was slated to beta others EN platforms. So I re-applied to do so at the earlier post link. I'm still waiting to hear BTW. Frankly, I would like to believe the EN development staff ARE interested. And not seeing the beta forums, I can't compare this forum and the beta, but would have thought that the trend that is being requested here IS for the EN staff to either comment / reply in THIS forum OR redirect to the appropriate place. They do neither. Which I think is the main point being put forward by those who post seeking EN feedback.
  6. I agree. Communication is a two way thing. Evernote product management needs to provide feedback. If they want, a seperate beta forum. I was told THIS was the place to lodge feedback (not complaints) and suggestions. Haven't heard ANYTHING back from Evernote staff. Nada. If I'm in the wrong place, then by all means contact me, privately if you need to, to advise the correct place, procedure to seriously assist.
  7. Confused. When posed the following to an Evernote staffer I am personally dealing with "Hey I was going to look how to seek a change to the iPad / iPhone versions of Evernote - specifically the moving (or making them movable) of some of the editing options. Like tab, bullets, numbering etc. They used to be on the page you were editing and now they are on a menu that requires you to click on the menu, click on the editing icon you want to invoke (say indentation) and then have to select the menu to get back to the page you were editing. it VERY cumbersome to use quickly and my note taking speed has reduced dramatically. Can you put the word in? Or point me to where I do?" The response was - "For feedback on any version of Evernote (including iPad/iPhone), post your comments in our discussion forums - that's where the product managers go to read feedback." I guess I could call it a "problem" and send to support. But it really isn't as it was the way it was re-designed. Frankly I suspected this forum, especially since the original post was from an employee (are they product management, professionally forum poster, or an intern?) was supposed to be about serious feedback. Since we don't see product management weighing in, I guess it's just a user forum where we help each other with technical aspects that can be corrected by technic. IMHO the point I was trying to make was that design change may not have had the widest input of initial or beta feedback, because the iPad workflow design issue again IMHO is a step BACK in design and not a step forward.
  8. OH, BTW, I was told that product management participated in this forum to resolve issues. Is it my imagination or is there no one here but us users (bar the sticky note at the top of this post from Evernote Employee
  9. Nope, same for me. Occasionally I can edit the title of the note and maybe the fields (but not always - must be the moon or the way I hold my mouth). WHY would you place a restriction on the modification of the record???????????
  10. OK, now I can add my vote to fix the slowness. I thought it was me or my iPad or iPhone, but it is WAY too slow, please fix i also wish to lodge a request to change the editing icon tool barto be flexible I find the need to click edit menu icon, then click the editing icon I need, then click the menu bar to bring back the text keyboard!!!! frustrating, time consuming and leads one to do less with text formatting. if this is this is the wrong place to mention, then pleas cross post using latest iOS and EN thanks Larry 2017FB23 19:45 Sydney Australia
  11. and as you say, need to edit in another window (and with another process and another product and ....)
  12. Yes it's an option, but doesn't always make for easy reading.
  13. Glad you vote in favour of improvement. I think part of this post also reflected that if you DID use alternate for complex note preparation there is ALSO a problem importing this complex note as the formatting (has for me anyway) been poorly reflected in the result in Evernote. Doing even simple cutting and pasting of web (as an example only) (not using web clipper) was extremely poor alignment. Even the simplest of editors can use a "block" statement that will import the info as fixed / "blocked" text".
  14. Like Asnook and to a lesser degree Palladion, I do not see why you make it an either choice? What happened to flexibility? Now I see know way of listing or looking at ALL my notes, business & personal a the same time. You have FORCED (by virtue of choosing to run the beta 6.11) me to chose an account. I think you would have been better served assist with Stacey's issue of moving notes. The concept of tabs is a good one, but as DTLow says, more options for content of tabs would be helpful (like the recent, current tasks, etc.) Currently works well as I have all notes, tags and work chat as tabs. Look forward to your implementing some of the suggestions made. Larry 2017JA07 09:40 Sydney
×
×
  • Create New...