The key principle is that I would like to have more space paying. Evernnote would receive. All the data architecture planning continue normal. It is to join two accounts in access. Think of the use and little space is a rational exercise:
>The best way to control the agenda is making individual notes and not by the list of tasks / checklists.
>notes have relationships with other notes and therefore generate more and more notes.
>the concept of folksonomy, TAG´s should be used to sort events, contacts, issues, records, objects, tasks, etc .. - Dynamic and Flexible (extensive use for better organization and traceability)
Evernote is not ready for the BIG DATA, which are effective and consistent long-term ways to extract: volume, variety, speed and value of the flood of daily information
analysis: a professional serves 36 people a day, all these services with the note on the task, with the necessary (client / patient, kind, context, etc ..) label. It is important to know that each client / patient should have a note of registration with personal data and a reference service tasks notes and records is done. For each service must have a note with the report (also be related to the registration of the person). It is good that the client and patients always have questions / issue (disagreements, questions, suggestions) - for each event should be a note and, of course, refers to the registration of the client / patient. good: 36x23 = 828 (attendances) - 828 notes Task 36x23 = 828 (Attendance Reports) - 828 notes / reports 1800 (new contacts, disagreements, questions, suggestions) = 3456 notes per month an average of 5 / Tag´s per note: 17280 * You can still increase referencial notes and materials labels / learning round 4000 with 20,000 tags and notes month that is: 2 years limits are insufficient conclusion >>> Only create the conditions to release more if needs with alternative plans <<<