Hi, yes I suppose the user experience will depend on the use case. I would have (likely) have never perceived a need to try ON if not for the sync disaster. Once I lost confidence in EN as a daily workspace, I felt forced to find something new. Once I had done that, ON won me over with a number of things, including the Microsoft ecosystem. However, I do not rely heavily on Mac for anything, and I've been told by others at work that they do not like using it on Mac. I do use the ON web version on my iMac and it works fine for me, but I use my PCs and desktop versions of ON more often than that. I've never had any sync issues except for the one I mentioned before. I do find that creating new notebooks in ON takes longer to sync than in EN, but it still works fine for me. I would love to use EN exclusively, assuming the sync problems were fixed. But I am not confident that the sync problems are and/or will stay fixed. The biggest reason for that is that they were never able to solve the problem when I was using EN, and support just faded away on it. Regardless, there are things that ON can do better than EN, and these things are tied directly to my work. Has anyone considered whether it makes sense to keep both systems and occasionally sync them, so that each one acts like a backup to the other? It is possible to migrate notes from one system to the other, or to duplicate content using an integration through IFTTT or Zapier. I've never given it much thought before, but I suppose it would be one way that you could enjoy the benefits of both while also creating some redundancy in your archives. It might be worth doing, if you really depend on one of these apps.