sanj

Not quite sure when this change happened, but the folder limit for premium has in fact been bumped up to 1000! This is AWESOME! Thank you Evernote!!

BTW jefito, thank you for the link on nesting. I found that option of tags being hierarchically organized quite useful, and it is one that I have not utilized. Given current limitations of the program (which I would still advocate changing for premium users) it's definitely worth incorporating into my organizing scheme.

The reason I need more than 250 folders is the same that you can't get by with just lower case-that's how I roll dude

I agree that limiting the folders of premium users to the same number, 250, as those who have free accounts, is ridiculous. It is the only major feature that does not upgrade for paying customers. Paying $70/year should allow an increase to at least 500, if not 1000.

I have been a premium customer for years but never ran into this problem: evernote caps the number of folders-at 250. While in theory a limit is not unreasonable, what I find very objectionable is that I, a premium customer who pays $70/year, has the same limit as a person who opens a free account. In fact I think this may be the only major feature that does not upgrade as you go from free to plus to premium. I really think it is ridiculous and would expect to have a limit of at least 500 or 1000. Better yet would be no limit as this is kind of stupid anyway for paying customers. We should be given flexibility, not constraints when paying for a service.

The idea the the order of the photos is, "by design," in the order of size and not the order taken is very strange. It undercuts the whole purpose of the feature's function. Even the most basic scanning app in the App Store gets the order right. To release this feature without basic functionality is unwise and frustrating to users. I know that eventually you guys will nail it, but for now it's probably best to scan in another program, such as scanner pro, and then import into evernote.

I noticed a change in the web clipper in safari today, to which I have mixed reactions. The article to be clipped appears on a white background and there is a tab to the right side that needs to be clicked in order to confirm/set notebook and save. There are also various ways of modifying the article, such as highlighting, etc. I have noticed that the clipper's ability to pick the correct notebook, which previously was almost unerring, is now often wrong. This is somewhat perplexing and unfortunate. The whole process now takes me longer to clip on safari which is also unfortunate.

Thanks for the tip! That was really irritating.

I have found searching to be painfully slow as well. It really makes the search function virtually unusable for me. This needs to be addressed as soon as possible.