kilavos

I agree with s2sailor. Most of my 50-70 shortcuts are saved searches (time-based or topic-based or a combination of both (e.g. projects uncompleted ="tag:project* todo:false" or appointments current week = "reminderTime:week -reminderTime:week+1 -tag:"XYZ"). It would be great to structure those shortcut list by style.

You are right, thanks, and It's curious: Via this dropdown or Ctrl+F5, Ctr-F6, Ctrl+F7 one can switch over to these different views of the note list (vertical with details is new for me, sorting very easy now). Or just switch with F5 only - and get different results depending on the default (vertical or horizontal) in the beginning. A good example, tells me that trial and error can achieve very useful results.

Thanks for the stimulating tip - it is WIN+F5 - obviously still a hidden keyboard shortcut and untouched in the menues.

I agree totally. BTW In your screenshot I realized the note list above the selected note. In V5 you have the choice between this display as a short list and a more detailed display in the middle between left (shortcuts) and right (note) window. Can be switched with Ctrl+F5 and Ctrl+F6. This seems to be gone in V6 ? I myself prefer the 2. option = note list in the middle. 2 reasons: 1. If exist pictures are displayed, easy to identify special notes. No display in the short list 2. I have 3 vertical windows: left window approx 15% of width =shortcuts etc - middle windo

... versus shortcuts in the side bar... I prefer Shortcuts in the side bar because having a list of several items reading is more comfortable when they are in vertical display Besides that the shortcuts in the tool bar seem to have a bug - in V5 and V6 as well: I have approx. 50-60 shortcuts, the first 6 or 7 are displayed in the tool bar, the dropdown button only shows the last 30 shortcuts - those in the middle are not displayed nor in other access.

I agree and think this is annoying and destroys my tag philosphy. I use tags only with a category prefix e.g. pers_Fischer, comp_Fischer, project_Fischer. Searching in V5 one gets a list with proposals, tags and recently used searches even when your input is Fischer only = in the middle of the tag. A very comfortable selection of items one can choose from. In V6 this way of selected list is gone. Input "Fischer" results in nothing. You have to start with the first character and have to remember this. This matches the syntax: tag:*Fischer does not work. Hope this will me m

Well, this is just the explanation I was looking for. And the answer to my questions. It seems to me that your environment is very special, might be even unique. Without having this background information it is not possible to understand your solution. Sure, works for you. However - without any knowlegde of this special background and reasons some Evernote user might misunderstand (often without scrutinising) and transfer your way to their individual evernote... No hard feelings

I've got an impression that this is a thought-terminating cliché - an ultimate argument in a debate, used to stop a discussion...o.k. I got it. Who is interested in a discussion with serious arguments and samples - JMichaelTX in particular - might have a look at See page 2 - item "Analyst, actually I find it FASTER to enter tags than the analogous keyword in the Title. Here's why:...

Hi - I'm a bit confused: 1. how do you remember all those types, subjects etc.? Using tags you have them stored, get a list etc. - parts of title can not be organized or listed... 2. how to avoid mistakes in writing? 3. Why not tagging with e.g. source_BBC, source_NYT etc I clip dozens of internet-articles (mainly as pdf) every week and tag them very easily with 1...3 tags - title comes automatically + no need to change as you described,