Jump to content
Due to limited staffing, chat support will be unavailable from Thursday, July 2 at 5:30 PM (CDT) to Monday, July 20 at 8 AM (CDT). This will allow us to reply to your email requests as quickly as possible. Thank you for understanding. ×


Level 1
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About TomasSweden

  1. Sorry, @gazumped, I realize I was not clear. There are a couple of things missing here which would enable you to more clearly see where I am at. Since I use Linux only, and Evernote has no dedicated Linux client, and the open source one is not up to par, I have to use the "web app". Which means analytics. For me, Evernote's appeal also had a lot to do with the Web Clipper, so again -- nothing in Evernote's privacy policy prevents them from integrating third-party analytics communication in the add-on (didn't investigate this, though). My notes are rarely of a sensitive nature (as my talk about encryption may have led you to believe). They are mostly about late ancient and medieval ethics and anthropology. Really really important stuff, of course, and I would actually want as many as possible to be in on it -- but thinking human beings, that is. So let's instead say that this is a matter of principle. The basic principle is this: If I pay for a service from a service provider who boasts privacy, I am assuming that the service provider will not delegate this service, or parts of this service, to a third party whose business model is based on mining my data for profit -- and I assume any data produced in the course of my using the service stays with me and the provider. Like you say, outside "replay sessions", analytics mostly records dates and url's connected to user. But these are not very helpful to Evernote themselves, so I am assuming they want more fine-grained data. Which explains their cooperating with service providers which can provide such more fine-grained data: Quote from Oliver_ENf2013's post: "Recently a study from Princeton analysed what is called session replay. Oversimplified, it is a third party company acting as man in the middle between your PC and the website you are visiting, which then tracks and stores every mouseclick and keystroke to help the site owner analyse their website. In order to do this, everything you type is not only stored at the website (like for example Evernote), but also on the servers of the analytics company." Evernote uses or used Malta-based hotjar, which records sessions. Which means potentially every key-press and mouse-movement is stored. Per their own statement on their website, hotjar honors the "Do not track" setting in browsers (which, famously, Google ignores and has always ignored). This is good news, of course, assuming hotjar is a honest and trustworthy outfit. Er, anyone know these people? ... At Google Keep I am knowingly paying for the service with my data. I thought Evernote provided an alternative in this regard. It seems I was wrong.
  2. Thanks again! @gazumped Yes, Evernote's own usage of info gathered is of course OK, as long as it is used to improve the service as you say. Problem is they're bringing in third party services to do it, whose business model is to collect all info they can and then find ways to capitalize on it. This is OK (actually not, but let's say so for the sake of argument) when the services provided are free of charge, but not inside a paid service, and especially not in a paid service that boasts about keeping your private data private. Services like these should keep far away from the Algorithm-feeders. @Metrodon Sure I can block them (and I do as far as I can tell) but I shouldn't need to worry about these things when I pay for the service. Running org-mode with encrypted files in cloud storage started to look as the best option again. Cheers, Tomas
  3. Thank you so much gazumped! Thanks especially for the link to the discussion started by Oliver_ENf2013!! I will admit I did only the usual eye-through of Evernote's privacy policy. (Like most I was impressed by the "we have your back" marketing mumbo jumbo, so I did not pay too much attention.) Now I dug deeper, and it turns out of course I am paying with both money and private data. Now I have to find the time to migrate my data, before cancelling my subscription. There was a time when such sleights-of-hand would be considered fraudulent, but now of course the vast majority couldn't care less. O tempora o mores. Cheers!
  4. I am a "premium" user, which means I pay to use Evernote. I suddenly realized Evernote is running analytics on its pages, which makes me wonder how much of my behavior on the site is recorded and fed into the Algorithm. I realize Google and others made the internet "free" (as in "free to rock the chain") by taking personal information, instead of money, in return for their products. I am not sure I feel OK both paying in money AND information, though. Can one opt out of the analytics? Cheers, Tomas from Sweden
  • Create New...