Jump to content

bradkrause67

Level 2
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About bradkrause67

Profile Information

  • Subscription
    PREMIUM
  1. @noduslabs I signed up back on January 7, 2016. 😲 Rather than dwell on that experience, I'll give you a second chance. Password recovery worked (autofill user name had % for spaces and failed, worked on retyping my user name). The service seems greatly improved from the first try, I'll see what else I can break, thanks.
  2. Re: 6.16.4.8094 (308094) Public (CE Build ce-58.1.6897) Feature Requests*: UPDATED DATE: I feel mislead as a user by this problem. Regardless of fanboy justifications in the other thread, this is my primary Feature Request: Any user action altering a classification of a note should be documented with Updated time code at the time of user reclassification, irrespective of sync time. I've upvoted all opinions to this effect. A Feature Request / Bug Report TEMPLATE might be a good tutorial/feature as well? One with a post to forum link might be most useful? *edited
  3. @CalS Hopefully we will both get improvements. Thanks for acknowledging the ever so slight benefit of my suggestion, even if it isn't your top priority. ?
  4. @Don DzEvernote is simply the best capture and archive solution. I cast a wide net and it catches it all. I bought a faster cpu for the client, but the tool is real. Frankly I can't read as fast as I capture on some issues and the search of images and pdfs is invaluable. I admit to redundantly adding tags based on search results, in addition to saving search criteria as a "saved search". Because my tag list is a large glossary of specific terms assigned at capture, through later searches, as well as Filterized automated tagging; I keep waiting for it to break (and religiously back it up) and i
  5. @DTLow actually that is an animated gif that spins to indicate the processes of the sync are active, not the rate it is syncing anything. It's like clocking into work vs. actually working. The Activity Log / disappearing items from the Sync column are the only real time, per item, sync progress indications one has in the gui that indicate a rate of progress that allows you to estimate the length of the sync remaining. @gustavgi points out the sync list fails to be useful with more than say 22 lines or so of changes, even if you remember to sort by the sync icon before you begin, so y
  6. I have an EN of 15,000+ research notes, I can make changes to thousands of notes at a time. (so probably more than even your 'tons' would imply) I turn off auto sync and sync manually so I can continue to work without constant freeze ups. Often my sync is over ten minutes at the end of say four hours use. So the spinning gif isn't really what I need, and the task manager isn't really what I need. The Log View is fine, but I'd rather that scroll was tucked in the corner, honestly showing sync state, since the text scroll is available windowed anyway. It's already information
  7. How long until sync is completed? I open my Help:Activity Log window and watch the scroll as the % completion is displayed. Since the sync process makes the client unresponsive, the log scroll adds confirmation that the process is not hung. The problem is I must open this log each time, simply to watch the % saved increase in the scroll, I don't need a window that size or the options to save off the log. I need feedback if I'm syncing successfully and an eyeball rate of sync so I can manage other tasks why the sync occurs. Therefore, adding a single line scroll to the inter
  8. yes, you'll need more than five tags to overflow the template space given, but since up to 100 tags per note may be assigned one would think you'd be able to show them in a printout (without exporting to html, which does show all tags)
  9. Oh, I played with that from lurking in the forums in the past. Works as advertised too. Should anyone want the free to play solution, it worked on Windows 7 before I upgraded to Windows 10. But I think I'll still expect EN to consider adding at least a view to the tags that can be selected and copied?
  10. That's the big payoff, you can cover so much ground on a topic with a detailed word cloud based on a targeted glossary. The formula is "text" and "number" for weighted tag text size; so "tag" and "number of times used" will give a word cloud. The exact information in the left sidebar, that I can't copy paste, either. Oh I could mess around with AutoKey scripts too. I'm frustrated I can SEE both lists; I just can't copy them to clipboard. I have a workaround with Filterize, so I'm not hamstrung, just making a feature request.? And I'm in editorial mode now, so ta
  11. I'm adding one tag at a time. For the last five years, as they became topical to the research. The list of all tags used in a multiple note selection is calculated and displayed as shadow checkboxes in the scrolling tag list. I just want that information without re-keying it or paying another service. Isn't the same process and making the Index page for group notes, only "Tag list for selection" not based on the assumption that only the shared tags will be important at first glance. Here is a wordcloud prototype of some of the topic tags, excluding contacts, events etc. that can accu
  12. I stand corrected. I highlight so often from right to left, I suppose the default behavior seemed the exception. Have an upvote.
  13. I'm looking for specific Visualization recommendations or people who have created dynamic visual reports from Evernote exports based on the tag association of the notes. Word clouds are also of interest, and I see that have been discussed on the forums several times. I am a fan of using whatever works and I used to have a Mac, but now I use a Windows machine, a Android Tablet and would even use a WearOS if there was an Evernote Client.
  14. An index note would be the example, it is a new note that links and directs to selected notes. In my use case, I may "see" 200 tags indicated out of my list of 700+. I'd rather have a text file of that information than have it cryptically indicated by shadow checkbox that I need click on...200 times for a new note that isn't associated with the note structure modeled without me typing an additional text block into the new note to explain what is going on. Is that more clear? The nested scroll traps the information from copy paste text activities. I should be able to easily audit all
×
×
  • Create New...