
razzendahcuben
Level 2-
Posts
17 -
Joined
-
Last visited
razzendahcuben's Achievements
4
Reputation
-
On the contrary. Depending on how the issue is searched for in google or this forum, people might run into one or the other. So I took the time to post the answer in both places to maximize the number of people helped. Also, its embarrassing that this bug hasn't been fixed --- if you're in the business of critical comments, one directed at the developers would be more appropriate.
-
This bug in infuriating. In Win 11, I was only able to get it "reset" to behave properly after using Win + LArrow/RArrow to place a non-EN window on one side of my screen, which then gave me a pop up to select which other window would be placed in the right side of my screen. I chose EN and that seemed to reset EN to use proper behavior. i can now get my notes to open properly in separate windows after double clicking them.
-
This bug in infuriating. In Win 11, I was only able to get it "reset" to behave properly after using Win + LArrow/RArrow to place a non-EN window on one side of my screen, which then gave me a pop up to select which other window would be placed in the right side of my screen. I chose EN and that seemed to reset EN to use proper behavior. i can now get my notes to open properly in separate windows after double clicking them.
-
This is Windows desktop. This has been going on for months and apparently its either a limitation of the collapse technology they're using or they just don't care. When I have a collapsed bullet point (A) and I hit ENTER while at the end of the line, it should take me to a NEW bullet point at the same level as the one I'm on. It should not a create a new sub-bullet. This same type of behavior occurs with headings as well. Hitting enter after a collapsed heading adds a new line within that heading, it does not does create a new line AFTER the heading. Very annoying. For example: COLLAPSED BULLET POINT (imagine this has 2 sub-bullets) If my cursor is at the end of that line, hitting enter should produce this: COLLAPSED BULLET POINT <my cursor is now on this new bullet point> Not this: UNCOLLAPSED BULLET POINT <my cursor is now on this new bullet point> Sub bullet point 1 Sub bullet point 2
-
Cool tool in theory. Too bad this happens regularly. I have no reason to believe this related to internet connectivity, by the way. Happens on multiple devices at multiple locations. Multiple notes. Just a recurring theme of trying to view content in the Lite editor. I have reported this. Anyone else experiencing this?
-
Your counter-arguments could be used to dissuade Bending Spoons from making any enhancement ever, so I don't find them compelling. Yeah, sure, someone could want the "next iteration" of this type of enhancement... but Spoons doesn't have to add it, so what does it matter? Speaking as a software developer: Considering the amount of effort that has been put into far less meaningful enhancements over the years, I hardly find this to be a technical challenge. I imagine that the stack code contains a fine starting point. Anyway, I think I've said as much as I need to say on this topic, and I've submitted a formal request, so I'm bowing out. Thanks, everyone.
-
You're still attacking a straw man. Not a single person here is advocating for "deep folder structures". I showed exactly what I'm trying to accomplish. I have used EN for years, both personal and business. The structure I demonstrate, a modification of PARA, in my original post is by far more efficient than using tags as the primary organizer. Interestingly, I posted this request on reddit, too, and people came out of the woodwork to comment that they'd like another level and that tag-centricism is inefficient. Anyway, if you don't want to use 2 levels of folders, that's fine, you're not affected by this in the least.
-
I have a space with hundreds of notes at the top level. I want to move all of them into a notebook in that space. AFAIK, the only way I can accomplish this is by individually dragging every single note into the notebook. The UI is baffling me. Why is there no multi-select feature, or select all button? This is evernote teams, if that matters.
-
And most peoples' evernotes are a complete disaster. EN grew bc of its UI and the reliability of its syncing, IMO. Yes, they're another view --- but what does the "stacks" view do that the "spaces" view doesn't? And you can't use them together, so it seems like one might as well use spaces since they have more functionality. Alright, I'll submit feedback there. Thanks.
-
Note: I'm a personal and teams user. My business pays a significant amount of money for EN teams each year. I manage the org's evernote account. This is a perennial frustration for both personal and work. First of all, as far as I know, there is no advantage to stacks over spaces, so I'll be converting my stacks to spaces. Second, Evernote's insistence that we organize primarily by tags and their refusal to allow more than two levels of structure needs to come to an end. The tags-centric paradigm doesn't work well. There are numerous reasons why tags-centricism are inefficient. In fact, I find the less I use, the better my note organization. As an early EN adopter, I bought into the idea that tags were the "smart" way to organize, and folder structures were what boomers stuck in Windows-world used. After a few years I realized that folders + tags are the best way to organize. Tags-centricism is just as bad as folders-centricism. Practically: If you're familiar with Tiago Forte's PARA organizational structure (or PRA, if you're like me and many others), its helpful but also doesn't go far enough, and that's partly bc he's using Evernote and therefore is limited in his folder structures due to Evernote's "no sub-folders" paradigm. He also strongly advocates for minimal tag usage. For example, let's say I have a Business space that I want to organize using PRA. It ought to look like this, at bare minimum. Space: Business Notebook: Sales Notebook: Projects Notebook: Resources Notebook: Archive Marketing Notebook: Projects Notebook: Resources Notebook: Archive Technical Notebook: Projects Notebook: Resources Notebook: Archive Admin Notebook: Projects Notebook: Resources Notebook: Archive Instead you have to have something like this, in which case all different aspects of your business are mixed together: Space: Business Notebook: Project Notebook: Resources Notebook: Archive Or something like this, in which case you have a mass of notebooks: Space: Business Notebook: Project - Marketing Notebook: Project - Sales Notebook: Project - Technical Notebook: Project - Admin Notebook: Resources - Marketing Notebook: Resources - Sales Notebook: Resources - Technical Notebook: Resources - Admin Notebook: Archive - Marketing Notebook: Archive - Sales Notebook: Archive - Technical Notebook: Archive - Admin Or you could multiple Spaces out (Business - Marketing, Business - Sales, etc). Bringing tags back into the picture: yes, you could tag notes with "sales", "marketing, "technical", "admin", but this is clunky from a UI perspective, plus its easy for me or my team to forget to tag something. The longer I develop databases, the more convinced I am that tags shouldn't be specifying Areas of Focus. I've stuck with EN through thick and thin. Guys, throw me a bone. The people who don't want to use multiple levels of notebooks don't have to.
-
I'm just baffled by this and finally decided to vent. I pay for evernote personal and my company drops a pretty penny on EN Teams each year. If you use Ctrl+F, it brings up a windows native (?) search tool. As soon as you start typing, the focus switches to the note, so you're now ruining your note! So, what you have to do is go to the ellipsis menu and click on Find In Note. This works properly. Why is the Evernote-friendly text-search tool not tied to Ctrl+F? Or why can't the standard tool work properly?