Is there anyway that EN can dedicate a portion of the main site for 'add-ons' and 'Applescripts' that have been 'approved by internal developers ???
I waste so much time digging into the forums and finding some brilliant AS that should have been built into the API anyway.
This is what TRUNK should have been used for anyway ( not the confusing brain child of the Marketing Dept ) - think of Firefox - they do this seamlessly - let the developers go do their thing but categorize them, rank them, etc. and let people customize their EN.
Also, get some 20 somethings in there on a bunch of platforms, but them some pizza and user-test this stuff. Sometimes I think you guys have never even field tested some of the functionality.
I really want to love EN, but it's so hard for anyone using it deeper than a notepad.
Idea
creativewombat 0
Is there anyway that EN can dedicate a portion of the main site for 'add-ons' and 'Applescripts' that have been 'approved by internal developers ???
I waste so much time digging into the forums and finding some brilliant AS that should have been built into the API anyway.
This is what TRUNK should have been used for anyway ( not the confusing brain child of the Marketing Dept ) - think of Firefox - they do this seamlessly - let the developers go do their thing but categorize them, rank them, etc. and let people customize their EN.
Also, get some 20 somethings in there on a bunch of platforms, but them some pizza and user-test this stuff. Sometimes I think you guys have never even field tested some of the functionality.
I really want to love EN, but it's so hard for anyone using it deeper than a notepad.
Link to comment
0 replies to this idea
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.