Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'keywords'.
Found 4 results
Hi, As a long term Premium Evernote user, I used the WebClipper quite a lot but as of today, for some reason, the keywords entered are reversed! When I type them, they already put the last character in front of the previous entered characters. Unfortunately, they are also stored like that....... As I couldn't believe what I noticed, I created a screendump so anyone else could see it. I tried to attached the screencapture to this topic but it is too big so here's the link: https://rvaneerd.stackstorage.com/s/FfNULw6C5qwHRY6 FYI: I'm using the Latest version of Mac OS (Sierra 10.12.5) and Evernote WebClipper 6.9.4. Did anyone else experience this? Regards, Rob.
I am a web client user only, as I am on Linux. The new web client looks great (imho) BUT: In my opinion one of the most important features is to be able to limit the keywords on display, i.e. so see only those, which are actually in use in a particular notebook. My keyword list is quite long but the set of keywords I use in particular notewooks are quite different for each notebook. In the current web beta there are now allways all keywords on display - which makes the sidebar almost impossible to use as there are all keywords from all notebooks, making it impossble to grasp the relevant one at one glance. In order to stay productive I decided to switch back to the classic web client.
We are investigating solutions for scanning comment cards into Evernote for my workplace. The comment cards are 6 x 4 post cards that a visitor can drop in a box or mail to us regarding their experience visiting our institution. In preliminary tests, we think Evernote can work well for us. We are ecstatic about EN's handwriting recognition capabilities -- certainly, much better than we were expecting. In a nutshell, the plan is to: Have a staff member scan comment cards into Evernote (as PDFs) using a document scanner Review and tag each comment card, now as note, in Evernote (for example: compliment, complaint, department, etc.) User Evernote to bulk email notes to specific managers (appropriately tagged notes are crucial for this step) It's important for us to use tags rather than notebooks as the primary organizing method, as a card might include comments that need to be reviewed by several different managers. Since our process is heavily dependent upon tags, it would be useful to have an option where notes can be auto-tagged based on predefined keywords. For example: If the card has the word loved, tag the note with Complement and/or if the card has the word docent, tag the note with Docents Department. The goal is to decrease the time it takes for the initial reviewer to process each comment card. We believe that this kind of feature could save many Evernote users time by providing accurate auto tagging. We have tried auto tagging via email, but unfortunately, this method does not seem to be very accurate. I have spent several hours searching forum topics regarding this kind of functionality. Various iterations have been requested over the years. Apparently, there was something similar to this feature in earlier versions of EN (Windows ver 2.x, I believe), but was for categories. I'm not sure if categories were more like notebooks rather than tags, but nevertheless, the feature was removed in subsequent releases. Hopefully, this kind of functionality can be implemented for business users, or better, both premium and business users in the future. Thank you.
Hi, How do I limit saved searches to tags and not keywords. I have tag names that are also contained as a word in a document. Some of my documents may contain words similar to many of my tags but I do not want these included in a saved search, I only want the search for documents having the assigned tags... I hope this is not some sort of limitation of tagging otherwise this would be another argument to add the ability to create notebooks, with pages and pages containing notes (similar to OneNote and Zoho NoteBook) instead of notebooks containing just notes (see my other post). Thanks