Jump to content

k9gardner

Level 1
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About k9gardner

Profile Information

  • Subscription
    PLUS
  1. This happened to me when I was using the Web version. I was in a detailed offsite seminar, using a new Windows laptop (on which I had not had a chance to install the Evernote program locally), taking copious notes, and during the afternoon session I kept experiencing the error mentioned. I kept losing pieces of what I had entered. After a while I noticed that multiple versions of the note had been spawned through this process, and I ended up with four different versions. I couldn't take the time to evaluate which note, if any, contained the complete set of info, so I quickly opted to download
  2. I appreciate your reply! And I thought of what you said here just after I posted my comment. That being said, I did find elsewhere in the Forums a link to 7.2.3 which that user (I believe an employee) said worked with El Cap. I downloaded it, and I concur: 7.2.3 has been working for me (for a day anyway!) with no problems on this installation of El Capitan. Still, while I understand what you're saying about there being ways to find it, and the possible "liability" perhaps that might be implied, I can tell you that other software vendors, like Intuit, make available earlier versions of QuickBoo
  3. Obviously Evernote is welcome to determine what level of OS they will support their product on, but there are some of us who need to keep it working on existing technology that cannot upgrade beyond a certain OS (such as this iMac Early 2008 that is at the maximum El Capitan, 10.11.6). I think when people are asking for the best version that will run on whatever system they are stuck with, it would be beneficial all if you would simply provide the download links with the note, "Hey, these aren't supported going forward, but they did work at the time. Use at your own risk." For example, I'm usi
  4. Yes, while there is a preferences setting to set the format for "insert date", the choices are simply not very robust. If this were to be expanded to include both a match to the Windows date+time style, and to the style that you request (which is also what want: YYYYMMDDHHMM), it would seem to solve the entire problem.
  5. And I'm looking for the opposite. The answer suggests that in the Windows version the system inserts Date+Time automatically, which is exactly what I would expect and want and would kill for. Ok, that's going too far. But it would be nice if a proper timestamp (date + time) could be inserted with a single key command rather than two. [Corollary question: if I just insert time, then, when I look at this entry tomorrow, will it show the date and time instead of just the time as it shows now? I guess I could wait till tomorrow to find out! I've been doing this manually in other ways prior to
×
×
  • Create New...