Jump to content

TomCog

Level 1
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About TomCog

Profile Information

  • Subscription
    PREMIUM
  1. Is this a dead idea? I have the same issue...I want to be able to mark-up screenshots of web pages, but the screenshot feature only grabs what is currently visible in the viewport. This renders the feature about 10% as usable as it would be if it could grab the entire page (including the content "below the fold"). Unfortunately, I'm going to have to go to a 3rd-party for this, which is a shame because Evernote is *so close* to providing an adequate solution (but you're missing it by *that* much...).
  2. Another severe limitation imposed by the way Evernote handles naming attachments is that even if you change the name - of a PDF, for example - the version that is locally stored on your computer does not get renamed. I scan directly to my Evernote account through my printer/scanner all the time, so all of my attachments have nonsense names. Yes, it's a hassle to have to go through and manually rename them, as Evernote doesn't provide an intelligent way to do this, but the local copies retain the original nonsense name. I regularly back up my local Evernote files and it's very difficult to make sense of them due to the way Evernote names everything. Cynically, I feel like they do this intentionally to make them useless without accessing them via the Evernote app. They're my files...Evernote shouldn't be making it difficult for me to manage them to compel me to rely on their product.
×
×
  • Create New...