The mistake would be to believe that only those that comment on this forum support bringing this feature back. Experience informs me that very few people actually use these types of forums to voice their complaints, and those that do are savvy enough to realize that after multiple releases between making the complaint and the present without seeing it brought back, nor any commentary from someone with the power to make it happen to indicate that it is being considered at all means it has been relegated to the dust-bin of requests. Also, exactly how many different ways of voicing suggestions and/or complaints does one have to use before getting a reaction either positive or negative: "Thank you for your suggestion. It is being considered for future release." is not very fulfilling. I find it sad that no one from Evernote support staff has come to the defense of the original decision to remove the feature. Sure, this is a user2user forum, but there must be some level of monitoring by Evernote support... right?
Having been a developer of multiple large scale projects over many decades I have a hard time understanding why the ability to allow users to customize their experience to their liking would be curtailed when I am confident that such a feature would not be all that difficult to reimplement, assuming, of course, that retrofitting the original code used to support it was not possible due to it being incompatible with the rewrite which caused its loss.
Evernote is fortunate that there is not a comparable competitor which would allow straightforward migration of existing Evernote notes. This was not one of those features that those who commented were simply wistful about its loss. Those who spoke up were fairly clear that this was a deal breaker had there been any other decent option, myself included. I'm pretty much convinced the feature is not coming back, but I don't have to like it.