As business users, we would love to be able to archive emails into notebooks for our clients. Presently, when we move emails into Evernote, no matter by which means (direct email, or any of the various plugins like Office 365 or Google Apps), the created date of the note does not match the actual date of the email. And there is no way to sort by the actual date of the email. Thus, unless we move the email over contemporaneously, it has the wrong date on the resulting note. For this reason, we cannot adopt company-wide Evernote as a repository for client-related emails.
Two possible solutions:
1. Give us the option to set the created date of the note to be equal to the set or received date of the email
2. Create a new column to sort by that is tied directly to the email date. If you are adding new columns, add one for sender and recipient too.
Note that Mail Butler currently uses option 1 for their solution, but it only works on OSX. Web users and Microsoft users are out of luck. It is also a pretty pricey solution.
Idea
TW 1
As business users, we would love to be able to archive emails into notebooks for our clients. Presently, when we move emails into Evernote, no matter by which means (direct email, or any of the various plugins like Office 365 or Google Apps), the created date of the note does not match the actual date of the email. And there is no way to sort by the actual date of the email. Thus, unless we move the email over contemporaneously, it has the wrong date on the resulting note. For this reason, we cannot adopt company-wide Evernote as a repository for client-related emails.
Two possible solutions:
1. Give us the option to set the created date of the note to be equal to the set or received date of the email
2. Create a new column to sort by that is tied directly to the email date. If you are adding new columns, add one for sender and recipient too.
Note that Mail Butler currently uses option 1 for their solution, but it only works on OSX. Web users and Microsoft users are out of luck. It is also a pretty pricey solution.
Link to comment
2 replies to this idea
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.