new editor: code block missing, found, mild cursing / markdown progress? docs?

[laird 2]

I see that the feature has moved to hide under the insert + icon (which makes no sense when I want to select a block of text and convert it to code but whatever).

Since it's all changing, is there an updated doc on how much markdown like behavior is being supported these days?  

[gazumped 11,656]

12 minutes ago, laird said:

Since it's all changing, is there an updated doc on how much markdown like behavior is being supported these days?

Nothing yet...

[Mike P 2,636]

23 hours ago, laird said:

Since it's all changing, is there an updated doc on how much markdown like behavior is being supported these days?  

The markdown (and pseudo markdown) I've found so far is:

Insert	"markdown"
horizontal line	--- (three dashes)
Code block	``` `code` (for inline code)
Table	[][][]x4
Headings	# ## or ###

Some of it has always worked in the legacy. I'm using the table shorcut alot now as it's so difficult to build a table in the new version which is not 2x2 .

Not surprisingly the three back ticks do not easily allow you to convert existing text into code.

[Mike P 2,636]

There is also 

- for a bulleted list

[] for a checklist or checkbox depending on context

1 for a numbered list

[Paul A. 613]

This markdown article still seems pretty accurate in terms of what is supported:

https://help.evernote.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001758468

 I don't know a way of converting existing text to a code block short of creating the code block and then cutting and pasting into the block, unfortunately.

[Mike P 2,636]

9 hours ago, Paul A. said:

This markdown article still seems pretty accurate in terms of what is supported:

https://help.evernote.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001758468

 I don't know a way of converting existing text to a code block short of creating the code block and then cutting and pasting into the block, unfortunately.

Good find, thanks. It obviously has been updated because ``` to insert a code block doesn't work in the legacy viewer. However it is missing the # method for headings and wrapping text in single back ticks to give

I don't think this could be done at all in the old version.